The only way anyone can be worthy of entering into Yahweh's Kingdom/Rest/Paradise/Heaven is to follow/obey Yahweh's Laws/Torah/Commands as taught by Moses the Prophets and Yeshua. Those that falsely and stubbornly think they can enter Paradise by the false teaching of faith and grace as taught by the murderer, tare and false apostle Paul are headed to that place that some call hades/hell.
First off, there is no "hell" in the Scriptures. 'Hades' is defined by the Jews as...
It connotes the place where those that had died were believed to be congregated.
'Sheol' is represented as the punishment from Genesis 3:19. There is no need for suffering or fire there.
tnt has never really come up with any Scriptural reason why he wants to ignore Paul, and his writings. Perhaps it is because Paul said something that he cannot justify in his little belief system.
Jesus was always very aware of the difference between the Jews and the Gentiles...
CLV Mt 10:6 Yet be going rather toward the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
CLV Mt 15:24 Now He, answering, said, "I was not commissioned except for the lost sheep of the house of Israel."
Also, read the story of the Greek woman...
CLV Mk 7:27 Yet Jesus said to her, "Let first the children be satisfied, for it is not ideal to take the children's bread and cast it to the puppies."
28 Yet she answered and is saying to Him, "Yes, Lord. For the puppies also, underneath the table, are eating the scraps from the little children."
Paul didn't call himself an apostle of Jesus Christ...
CLV Ro 1:1 Paul, a slave of Christ Jesus, a called apostle, severed for the evangel of God
But was called by God to deliver the evangel of the Uncircumcision...
CLV Ga 2:7 But, on the contrary, perceiving that I have been entrusted with the evangel of the Uncircumcision,
8 according as Peter of the Circumcision (for He Who operates in Peter for the apostleship of the Circumcision operates in me also for the nations),
just as Peter operates for the evangel of the Circumcision.
Paul did not require the Gentiles (the Uncircumcision) to follow all the Laws of Moses that the Jews were given. Also, some are fond of calling Paul a murderer, and yet did not Moses also murder?
For these reasons, tnt is just another false teacher.
I may have incorrectly used the term scapegoat vs sacrificial lamb. Perhaps you can explain the difference regarding God's Atonement plan and Day of Atonement.
There is no "scapegoat" in the Scriptures...
CLV Lv 16:8 Then Aaron will cast lots over the two hairy goats, one lot for Yahweh and one lot for the goat of departure.
CLV Lv 16:10 Yet the hairy goat over which the lot for the goat of departure comes up shall stay alive before Yahweh to make a propitiatory shelter over it and to send it away as the goat of departure to the wilderness.
H5799 `aza'zel az-aw-zale'
from H5795 and H235;
goat of departure; the scapegoat.
Jesus was never referred to as a "scapegoat" or a "goat of departure" in the Bible.
The phrase "sacrificial lamb" is not used in the Bible either.
Since neither of these terms are in the Bible, it would be impossible to use them incorrectly. What is incorrect is attributing either of them to Christ.
CLV 2Ti 1:13 Have a pattern of sound words, which you hear from me, in faith and love which are in Christ Jesus.
Meet singles at DateHookup.com, we're 100% free! Join now!
How about Paschal Lamb?
Could it be that our sins are passed over due to Jesus, rather than His atoning for us? Isn't Jesus' sacrifice an atonement?
Blessed is the man unto whom the LORD imputeth not iniquity, and in whose spirit there is no guile.
(But it added the and in whose spirit there is no guile part)
How about Paschal Lamb?
The phrase "Paschal Lamb" is not Scriptural.
Other than that, your post makes no sense.